Download or read book Majority Judgment written by M. L. Balinski and published by MIT Press. This book was released on 2010 with total page 431 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: An account of a new theory and method of voting, judging and ranking, majority judgment, shown to be superior to all other known methods. In Majority Judgment, Michel Balinski and Rida Laraki argue that the traditional theory of social choice offers no acceptable solution to the problems of how to elect, to judge, or to rank. They find that the traditional model--transforming the "preference lists" of individuals into a "preference list" of society--is fundamentally flawed in both theory and practice. Balinski and Laraki propose a more realistic model. It leads to an entirely new theory and method--majority judgment--proven superior to all known methods. It is at once meaningful, resists strategic manipulation, elicits honesty, and is not subject to the classical paradoxes encountered in practice, notably Condorcet's and Arrow's. They offer theoretical, practical, and experimental evidence--from national elections to figure skating competitions--to support their arguments. Drawing on insights from wine, sports, music, and other competitions, Balinski and Laraki argue that the question should not be how to transform many individual rankings into a single collective ranking, but rather, after defining a common language of grades to measure merit, how to transform the many individual evaluations of each competitor into a single collective evaluation of all competitors. The crux of the matter is a new model in which the traditional paradigm--to compare--is replaced by a new paradigm--to evaluate.
Download or read book Majority Judgment written by Fouad Sabry and published by One Billion Knowledgeable. This book was released on 2024-09-05 with total page 354 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: In the evolving field of Political Science, grasping innovative electoral methods is key to improving democratic decision-making. "Majority Judgment" offers an in-depth look at a transformative voting system called Majority Judgment, detailing its principles, applications, and significance for democracy. This book is a must-read for anyone interested in modern electoral systems and their role in ensuring fair elections. 1-Majority Judgment-Understand the basics of Majority Judgment and its approach to fair voting. 2-Score Voting-Discover how Score Voting compares with Majority Judgment in enhancing voter satisfaction. 3-Condorcet Method-Learn about the Condorcet Method and its connection to Majority Judgment. 4-Copeland's Method-Examine how Copeland’s Method addresses strategic voting issues. 5-Bucklin Voting-Explore Bucklin Voting and its link to Majority Judgment principles. 6-Ranked Pairs-Understand how Ranked Pairs achieves consensus winners and relates to Majority Judgment. 7-Instant-Runoff Voting-Compare the simplicity of Instant-Runoff Voting with Majority Judgment. 8-Comparison of Electoral Systems-Compare different electoral systems and their strengths alongside Majority Judgment. 9-Evaluative Voting-Learn about Evaluative Voting and its role in Majority Judgment. 10-Usual Judgment-Understand Usual Judgment and its connection to Majority Judgment. 11-Strategic Voting-Address how Majority Judgment mitigates the effects of Strategic Voting. 12-Condorcet Winner Criterion-Learn about the Condorcet Winner Criterion and its relation to Majority Judgment. 13-Participation Criterion-Discover how Majority Judgment supports the Participation Criterion. 14-Majority Criterion-Explore how Majority Judgment ensures a majority-supported winner. 15-Consistency Criterion-Analyze how Majority Judgment meets the Consistency Criterion. 16-Mutual Majority Criterion-Understand the Mutual Majority Criterion and how it aligns with Majority Judgment. 17-Condorcet Loser Criterion-Learn how Majority Judgment avoids electing the least-preferred candidate. 18-Reversal Symmetry-Discover how Majority Judgment upholds fairness in reversed preferences. 19-Cardinal Voting-Explore the evaluative approach of Cardinal Voting and its link to Majority Judgment. 20-STAR Voting-Analyze how STAR Voting combines aspects of Score Voting and Majority Judgment. 21-Highest Median Voting Rules-Learn how Highest Median Voting Rules relate to Majority Judgment. "Majority Judgment" provides a comprehensive examination of electoral systems, offering professionals, students, and enthusiasts valuable insights into democratic processes. Its analysis extends beyond surface-level knowledge, providing a rich exploration of the impact of various voting methods.
Download or read book Majority Decisions written by Stéphanie Novak and published by Cambridge University Press. This book was released on 2014-06-30 with total page 271 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This book presents the most complete set of analytical, normative, and historical discussions of majority decision making to date. One chapter critically addresses the social-choice approach to majority decisions, whereas another presents an alternative to that approach. Extensive case studies discuss majority voting in the choice of religion in early modern Switzerland, majority voting in nested assemblies such as the French Estates-General and the Federal Convention, majority voting in federally organized countries, qualified majority voting in the European Union Council of Ministers, and majority voting on juries. Other chapters address the relation between majority decisions and cognitive diversity, the causal origin of majority decisions, and the pathologies of majority decision making. Two chapters, finally, discuss the counter-majoritarian role of courts that exercise judicial review. The editorial Introduction surveys conceptual, causal, and normative issues that arise in the theory and practice of majority decisions.
Download or read book Majority Judgment written by Michel Balinski and published by MIT Press. This book was released on 2022-06-07 with total page 431 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: An account of a new theory and method of voting, judging and ranking, majority judgment, shown to be superior to all other known methods. In Majority Judgment, Michel Balinski and Rida Laraki argue that the traditional theory of social choice offers no acceptable solution to the problems of how to elect, to judge, or to rank. They find that the traditional model—transforming the "preference lists" of individuals into a "preference list" of society—is fundamentally flawed in both theory and practice. Balinski and Laraki propose a more realistic model. It leads to an entirely new theory and method—majority judgment—proven superior to all known methods. It is at once meaningful, resists strategic manipulation, elicits honesty, and is not subject to the classical paradoxes encountered in practice, notably Condorcet's and Arrow's. They offer theoretical, practical, and experimental evidence—from national elections to figure skating competitions—to support their arguments. Drawing on insights from wine, sports, music, and other competitions, Balinski and Laraki argue that the question should not be how to transform many individual rankings into a single collective ranking, but rather, after defining a common language of grades to measure merit, how to transform the many individual evaluations of each competitor into a single collective evaluation of all competitors. The crux of the matter is a new model in which the traditional paradigm—to compare—is replaced by a new paradigm—to evaluate.
Download or read book Majority Judgment Vs Approval Voting written by Michel Balinski and published by . This book was released on 2018 with total page pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
Download or read book Tie Breaking the Highest Median written by Adrien Fabre and published by . This book was released on 2019 with total page 13 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: The paper deals with voting rules that require voters to rate the candidates on a finite evaluation scale and then elect a candidate whose median grade is maxi- mum. These rules differ by the way they choose among candidates with the same median grade. Call proponents (resp. opponents) of a candidate the voters who rate this candidate strictly above (resp. strictly below) her median grade. A simple rule, called the typical judgment, orders tied candidates by the difference between their share of proponents and opponents. An appealing rule, called the usual judgment, divides this difference by the share of median votes. An alternative rule, called the central judgment, compares the relative shares of proponents and opponents. The usual judgment is continuous with respect to these shares. The majority judgment of Balinski & Laraki (2007) considers the largest of these shares and loses continuity. A result in Balinski & Laraki (2014) aims to characterize the majority judgment and states that only a certain class of functions share some valuable characteristics, like monotonicity. We relativize this result, by emphasizing that it only holds true for continuous scales of grades. Properties remaining specific to the majority judgment in the discrete case are idiosyncratic features rather than universally sought criteria, and other median-based rules exist that are both monotonic and continuous.
Download or read book Model Rules of Professional Conduct written by American Bar Association. House of Delegates and published by American Bar Association. This book was released on 2007 with total page 216 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions look to the Rules for guidance in solving lawyer malpractice cases, disciplinary actions, disqualification issues, sanctions questions and much more. In this volume, black-letter Rules of Professional Conduct are followed by numbered Comments that explain each Rule's purpose and provide suggestions for its practical application. The Rules will help you identify proper conduct in a variety of given situations, review those instances where discretionary action is possible, and define the nature of the relationship between you and your clients, colleagues and the courts.
Download or read book Majority Rule and Minority Rights written by Henry Steele Commager and published by . This book was released on 1950 with total page 104 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
Download or read book Diversity Judgments written by Roy L. Brooks and published by Cambridge University Press. This book was released on 2022-03-17 with total page 657 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Shows how the Supreme Court can repair its diminished legitimacy in a society committed to diversity and inclusion.
Download or read book Judgment Calls written by Daniel A. Farber and published by Oxford University Press. This book was released on 2008-11-19 with total page 218 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Judgement Calls tackles one of the most important and controversial legal questions in contemporary America: How should judges interpret the Constitution? Our Constitution contains a great deal of language that is vague, broad, or ambiguous, making its meaning uncertain. Many people believe this uncertainty allows judges too much discretion. They suggest that constitutional adjudication is just politics in disguise, and that judges are legislators in robes who read the Constitution in accordance with their own political views. Some think that political decision making by judges is inevitable, and others think it can be restrained by "strict constructionist" theories like textualism or originalism. But at bottom, both sorts of thinkers believe that judging has to be either tightly constrained and inflexible or purely political and unfettered: There is, they argue, no middle ground. Farber and Sherry disagree, and in this book they describe and defend that middle ground. They show how judging can be--and often is--both principled and flexible. In other words, they attempt to reconcile the democratic rule of law with the recognition that judges have discretion. They explain how judicial discretion can be exercised responsibly, describe the existing constraints that guide and cabin such discretion, and suggest improvements. In exploring how constitutional adjudication works in practice (and how it can be made better), Farber and Sherry cover a wide range of topics that are relevant to their thesis and also independently important, including judicial opinion-writing, the use of precedent, the judicial selection process, the structure of the American judiciary, and the nature of legal education. They conclude with a careful look at how the Supreme Court has treated three of the most significant and sensitive constitutional issues: terrorism, abortion, and affirmative action. Timely, trenchant, and carefully argued, Judgment Calls is a welcome addition to the literature on the intersection of constitutional interpretation and American politics.
Download or read book Final Judgment written by Alan Paterson and published by A&C Black. This book was released on 2014-07-18 with total page 566 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Winner of the Inner Temple book prize 2015 and the Socio-Legal Studies Association Book prize 2014/15 The House of Lords, for over 300 years the UK's highest court, was transformed in 2009 into the UK Supreme Court. This book provides a compelling and unrivalled view into the workings of the Court during its final decade, and into the formative years of the Supreme Court. Drawing on over 100 interviews, including more than 40 with Law Lords and Justices, and uniquely, some of their judicial notebooks, this is a landmark study of appellate judging 'from the inside' by an author whose earlier work on the House of Lords has provided a scholarly benchmark for over 30 years. The book demonstrates that appellate decision-making in the UK's final court remains a social and collective process, primarily because of the dialogues which take place between the judges and the key groups with which they interact when reaching their decisions. As the book shows, the forms of dialogue are now more varied, yet the most significant dialogues continue to be with their fellow Law Lords and Justices, and with counsel. To these, new dialogues have been added, namely those with foreign courts (especially Strasbourg) and with judicial assistants, which have subtly altered the tenor and import of their other dialogues. The research reveals that, unlike the English Court of Appeal, the House of Lords in its last decade was only intermittently collegial since Lord Bingham's philosophy of appellate judging left opinion writing, concurrences and dissents largely to individual preference. In the Supreme Court, however, there has been a marked shift to team working and collective decision-making bringing with it challenges and occasional tensions not seen in the final years of the House of Lords. The work shows that effectiveness in group-decision making in the final court turns in part on the stages when dialogues occur, in part on the geography of the court and in part on the task leadership and social leadership skills of the judges involved in particular cases. The passing of the Human Rights Act and the expansion in judicial review over the last 30 years have dramatically altered the two remaining dialogues - those with Parliament and with the Executive. With the former, the dialogue has grown more distant, with the latter, more problematic, than was the case 40 years ago. The last chapter rehearses where the changing dialogues have left the UK's final court. Ironically, despite the oft applauded commitment of the new Court to public visibility, the book concludes that even greater transparency in the dialogue with the public may be required. 'The way appellate judges at the highest level behave to each other, to counsel, with other branches of government and with other courts is brought under closer scrutiny in this book than ever before...The remarkable width and depth of his examination...has resulted in a work of real scholarship, which all those who are interested in how appellate courts work all over the common law world will find especially valuable.' From the foreword by Lord Hope of Craighead KT 'Alan Paterson's knowledge and interest in the Supreme Court, coupled with his expertise as a lawyer who understands the legal system and the judicial process, make him a perfect chronicler and assessor of what the Court's role is and what it should be, and how it functions and how it might improve.' Lord Neuberger, President of the Supreme Court
Download or read book Influence of the Mode of Presenting Majority Responses Upon Individual Judgments written by Lois A. Campolo and published by . This book was released on 1966 with total page 54 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
Download or read book Judgments of Majority Decision Rules for Cases of Varying Seriousness written by Suzi Kaye Zimmerman and published by . This book was released on 1986 with total page 112 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
Download or read book In Situ and Laboratory Experiments on Electoral Law Reform written by Bernard Dolez and published by Springer Science & Business Media. This book was released on 2010-12-01 with total page 176 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: In the modern era, representation is the hallmark of democracy, and electoral rules structure how representation works and how effectively governments perform. Moreover, of the key structural variables in constitutional design, it is the choice of electoral system that is usually the most open to change. There are three distinctive approaches to electoral system research. One, associated largely with economics, involves the study of electoral system effects through the deductive method, using mathematical tools to derive theorems about the properties of voting methods and behaviors. A second, associated largely with political science, has a primarily empirical focus, and looks in depth at how electoral rules impact on political outcomes, through large cross-sectional or case studies. A third, and more recent tradition, inspired largely by work in experimental economics, involves experimentation, either in the form of controlled laboratory experiments or in the form of in situ field studies. This volume employs the third approach to report on experiments that look at alternatives to the present two round (majority runoff) system used for the election of French presidents. This system is of considerable importance not just because of its use in France but also because of its wide adoption in presidential elections in new democracies, such as Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, Russia and Ukraine. The editors have assembled the top experimental economists and political scientists specializing in French politics to provide in-depth analysis of the double ballot electoral system, and, more broadly, of the effect of electoral rules on the number of candidates, voter strategies, and ideological choice. Ultimately, the editors and contributors argue that experimental methods have great potential to inform our understanding of institutional mechanisms in the context of voting behavior.
Download or read book Sitting in Judgment written by Penny Darbyshire and published by Bloomsbury Publishing. This book was released on 2011-09-30 with total page 478 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: The public image of judges has been stuck in a time warp; they are invariably depicted in the media - and derided in public bars up and down the country - as 'privately educated Oxbridge types', usually 'out-of-touch', and more often than not as 'old men'. These and other stereotypes - the judge as a pervert, the judge as a right-wing monster - have dogged the judiciary long since any of them ceased to have any basis in fact. Indeed the limited research that was permitted in the 1960s and 1970s tended to reinforce several of these stereotypes. Moreover, occasional high profile incidents in the courts, elaborated with the help of satirists such as 'Private Eye' and 'Monty Python', have ensured that the 'old white Tory judge' caricature not only survives but has come to be viewed as incontestable. Since the late 1980s the judiciary has changed, largely as a result of the introduction of training and new and more transparent methods of recruitment and appointment. But how much has it changed, and what are the courts like after decades of judicial reform? Given unprecedented access to the whole range of courts - from magistrates' courts to the Supreme Court - Penny Darbyshire spent seven years researching the judges, accompanying them in their daily work, listening to their conversations, observing their handling of cases and the people who come before them, and asking them frank and searching questions about their lives, careers and ambitions. What emerges is without doubt the most revealing and compelling picture of the modern judiciary in England and Wales ever seen. From it we learn that not only do the old stereotypes not hold, but that modern 'baby boomer' judges are more representative of the people they serve and that the reforms are working. But this new book also gives an unvarnished glimpse of the modern courtroom which shows a legal system under stress, lacking resources but facing an ever-increasing caseload. This book will be essential reading for anyone wishing to know about the experience of modern judging, the education, training and professional lives of judges, and the current state of the courts and judiciary in England and Wales.
Download or read book Good Judgment written by Robert J. Sharpe and published by University of Toronto Press. This book was released on 2018-10-11 with total page 351 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Good Judgment, based upon the author's experience as a lawyer, law professor, and judge, explores the role of the judge and the art of judging. Engaging with the American, English, and Commonwealth literature on the role of the judge in the common law tradition, Good Judgment addresses the following questions: What exactly do judges do? What is properly within their role and what falls outside? How do judges approach their decision-making task? In an attempt to explain and reconcile two fundamental features of judging, namely judicial choice and judicial discipline, this book explores the nature and extent of judicial choice in the common law legal tradition and the structural features of that tradition that control and constrain that element of choice. As Sharpe explains, the law does not always provide clear answers, and judges are often left with difficult choices to make, but the power of judicial choice is disciplined and constrained and judges are not free to decide cases according to their own personal sense of justice. Although Good Judgment is accessibly written to appeal to the non-specialist reader with an interest in the judicial process, it also tackles fundamental issues about the nature of law and the role of the judge and will be of particular interest to lawyers, judges, law students, and legal academics.
Download or read book Cardinal Voting written by Fouad Sabry and published by One Billion Knowledgeable. This book was released on 2024-09-04 with total page 361 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Unlock the power of voting systems with "Cardinal Voting," part of the "Political Science" series. This book delves into cardinal voting—a revolutionary method where voters rate candidates, offering a new perspective on electoral fairness and decision-making. 1-Cardinal Voting-Learn the basics of cardinal voting, where voters use a numerical scale to express preferences, providing a richer view than traditional methods. 2-Approval Voting-Understand approval voting, where voters simply approve or disapprove of candidates, and its connection to cardinal voting for better accuracy. 3-Score Voting-Explore score voting, where candidates are rated, and its impact on elections compared to other systems. 4-Condorcet Paradox-Discover the Condorcet paradox and its effects on cardinal voting by highlighting voting system complexities. 5-Arrow's Impossibility Theorem-Analyze Arrow's theorem and its implications for designing effective cardinal voting systems. 6-Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives-Examine this key criterion affecting fairness in voting systems and its relevance to cardinal voting. 7-Gibbard–Satterthwaite Theorem-Understand this theorem’s insights into strategic voting and its limitations within cardinal voting. 8-Bucklin Voting-Learn about Bucklin voting, blending ranked and cardinal voting elements, and its decision-making impact. 9-Majority Criterion-Review the majority criterion’s role in ensuring cardinal voting reflects true majority preferences. 10-Positional Voting-Compare positional and cardinal voting systems, and see how each affects electoral outcomes. 11-Strategic Voting-Investigate strategic voting and its impact on the integrity of cardinal voting systems. 12-Allan Gibbard-Explore Allan Gibbard’s contributions to voting theory and their influence on cardinal voting. 13-Social Choice and Individual Values-Examine the link between social choice theory and individual preferences in cardinal voting. 14-Later-no-harm Criterion-Understand how this criterion preserves voter preferences in cardinal voting systems. 15-Majority Judgment-Consider majority judgment as an alternative to cardinal voting and its potential benefits. 16-Ranked Voting-Compare ranked voting with cardinal voting to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each. 17-Comparison of Electoral Systems-Get a detailed comparison of electoral systems and the unique benefits of cardinal voting. 18-Gibbard's Theorem-Revisit Gibbard’s theorem and its effect on strategic behavior in cardinal voting. 19-Combined Approval Voting-Explore combined approval voting and its integration with cardinal voting principles. 20-Highest Median Voting Rules-Understand highest median voting rules and their role in cardinal voting. 21-Usual Judgment-Learn about usual judgment and its impact on electoral outcomes alongside cardinal voting. "Cardinal Voting" offers deep insights into electoral systems, bridging theory with practical application. Elevate your understanding of voting systems today.
