Download or read book Appointment of the Chair of the Care Quality Commission written by Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Health Committee and published by The Stationery Office. This book was released on 2008 with total page 28 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: The Government is committed to involving Parliament in the appointment of key public officials, and nominees for certain positions should be subject to a pre-appointment hearing with the relevant select committee. The hearing would be non-binding, but in the light of the report from the committee, Ministers would decide whether to proceed. On 30 April 2008, the Secretary of State invited the Health Committee to hold a pre-appointment hearing in respect of Baroness Young of Old Scone, the candidate for Chair of the Care Quality Commission (CQC). The Report looks first at the CQC and the role of the Chair, then at the appointment process, and finally considers the suitability of the candidate. The Committee finds that Baroness Young is a suitable candidate for the post, and has the requisite professional competence, independence and integrity.
Download or read book Appointment of the Chair of the Care Quality Commission written by Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Health Committee and published by . This book was released on 2010-09-15 with total page 11 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: On July 20 2010 the Secretary of State for Health informed the Health Committee that the Government proposed to appoint Dame Jo Williams as chair of the Care Quality Commission. The Committee held a pre-appointment hearing on 9 September and endorse Dame Jo Williams candidacy for the post. The Committee also stated its concurrence with Dame Jo that although the CQC has made encouraging progress a substantial number issues remain. Some of the key points forward included: the need to establish a clear understanding of the distinctive roles of the chair, chief executive and management; the need to develop a common 'CQC culture'; the need to develop clear internal cost and efficiency targets and reporting procedures; and practical challenges arising from the merger
Download or read book Appointment of the Chair of the Care Quality Commission written by Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Health Committee and published by . This book was released on 2015-12-07 with total page 14 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Pre-appointment hearing to consider Peter Wyman as new chair of the Care Quality Commission. The Committee endorsed his appointment
Download or read book House of Commons Health Committee Appointment of the Chair of Monitor HC 744 written by Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Health Committee and published by The Stationery Office. This book was released on 2013-10-24 with total page 16 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: In April 2010 Dr David Bennett was appointed as interim Chief Executive of Monitor and then as Chair in March 2011. He was appointed permanent Chief Executive of Monitor with effect from 1 November 2012, while remaining as Chair pending a new appointment. On 10 October 2013, the Secretary of State proposed to appoint Dominic Dodd as Chair of Monitor. Dr Bennett has filled the roles of both Chair and Chief Executive - effectively Executive Chair - and has led Monitor through the whole process of change brought about by the Health and Social Care Act 2012. He has both shaped and interpreted the role that Monitor now plays in the system which makes the transition to another individual taking on the Chair an especially difficult one. On this basis the Committee did not endorse Mr Dodd's appointment
Download or read book Appointment of the Chair of the Care Quality Commission written by Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Health Committee and published by . This book was released on 2012-12-13 with total page 8 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: The Government is committed to involving Parliament in the appointment of key public officials, and nominees for certain positions should be subject to a pre-appointment hearing with the relevant select committee. The hearing would be non-binding, but in the light of the report from the committee, Ministers would decide whether to proceed.
Download or read book 2012 Accountability Hearing with the Care Quality Commission written by Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Health Committee and published by The Stationery Office. This book was released on 2013-01-09 with total page 90 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: The failures of Care Quality Commission (CQC) prompted the Department of Health to undertake a performance and capability review which produced a wide range of recommendations. The decision by CQC board member Kay Sheldon to give evidence as a whistleblower added to the controversy. She identified serious failings within the management, organisation, functions and culture of the CQC and it is unacceptable that the CQC failed to address and act on them before she felt compelled to approach the public inquiry. It is clear from the evidence presented by the CQC's outgoing Chair, Jo Williams, and recently appointed Chief Executive, David Behan, that the regulator is aware of the reforms that must be implemented. The CQC's primary focus should be on ensuring that the essential standards it enforces can be interpreted by the public as a guarantee of acceptable standards in care. The CQC's essential standards in their current form do not succeed in this objective. Equally, the CQC must be far more diligent in communicating the outcomes of inspections, especially to residents in social care and their immediate family. In the long-term, the CQC has a role to play in facilitating a culture of challenge and response across health and social care so that identifying and addressing failings becomes a standard process for staff and management. Providers must support staff in raising concerns in order for those staff to meet their own professional duties. Those organisations who fail in this obligation should be refused registration by the CQC.
Download or read book Appointment of the Chair of the Care Quality Commission written by Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Health Committee and published by . This book was released on 2008-06-19 with total page 21 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Appointment of the chair of the Care Quality Commission : Fourth report of session 2007-08, Vol. 2: Oral and written Evidence
Download or read book Select Committees and public appointments written by Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Liaison Committee and published by The Stationery Office. This book was released on 2011-09-05 with total page 80 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This report considers the experience of some three years of holding 'pre-appointment' hearings by select committees to examine the 'preferred candidate' for certain public appointments before that appointment is confirmed. Whilst the committee considers the experiment a success they do recommend a number of changes. They propose a three tier list: Posts in the first tier are those considered to be of sufficient constitutional significance as to require a process which is effectively a joint appointment by Government and the House of Commons. Posts in the second tier are those which the committee proposes should be subject to an enhanced an improved version of the current process, and which should be subject to an 'effective veto' by the House of Commons or its committees. For posts in the third tier, pre-appointment hearings should be at the discretion of committees.
Download or read book HC 401 Managing the Care of People with Long Term Conditions written by Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Health Committee and published by The Stationery Office. This book was released on 2014-07-03 with total page 228 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: 15 million NHS patients in England with long-term conditions such as diabetes, arthritis and asthma account for 70% of the annual expenditure of the NHS in England. One projection estimating that the bill for treatment of long-term conditions will require the NHS to find £4 billion more each year by 2016. Increasingly, patients do not have a single long-term condition but live with two or more conditions, complicating treatment and adding to its cost. The Committee strongly supports the development of individual care planning for people with long-term conditions, based on the principles successfully demonstrated in the NHS House of Care programme. Care planning approaches will involve GPs, community health services and specialists sitting down with the patient to draw up a personalised plan for the care required, which includes the support needed to help the patient manage his or her own condition. The challenge, though, of introducing personalised care planning for 15 million people is substantial. The Committee looked at the prevailing view that services to treat long-term conditions should be moved out of hospitals and into primary and community care. To provide effective care for these conditions, services have to be maintained across all settings, from support in the home through to acute specialist care, and many conditions will continue to require specialist services delivered in hospital. Effective management of long-term conditions also requires collaboration with other government providers, such as housing and transport services.
Download or read book Pre appointment hearings by select committees written by Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Liaison Committee and published by The Stationery Office. This book was released on 2008-03-05 with total page 40 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Pre-appointment hearings by select Committees : First report session 2007 - 2008, report and annexes, together with formal Minutes
Download or read book Annual accountability hearings written by Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Health Committee and published by The Stationery Office. This book was released on 2012-03-07 with total page 112 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Responses to HC 1428, on the Annual accountability hearings with the Nursing and Midwifery Council (ISBN 9780215560933); 1429 on the Annual accountability hearings with the General Medical Council (ISBN 9780215560926) & 1430 on the Annual accountability hearings with the Care Quality Commission (ISBN 9780215561305)
Download or read book Commissioning written by Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Health Committee and published by The Stationery Office. This book was released on 2010-03-30 with total page 78 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Commissioning : Fourth report of session 2009-10, Vol. 1: Report, together with formal Minutes
Download or read book House of Commons Health Committee After Francis Making A Difference HC 657 written by Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Health Committee and published by The Stationery Office. This book was released on 2013-09-18 with total page 188 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: The NHS needs to be an organization in which an open dialogue about care quality is part of the natural culture of the organization, not a duty which only arises in cases of service failure. Robert Francis made 290 recommendations in his report, but in truth they boil down to just one - that the culture of 'doing the system's business' is pervasive in parts of the NHS and has to change. Many who raise their concerns in the NHS at present risk serious consequences for their employment and professional status. But disciplinary procedures, professional conduct hearings and employment tribunals are not the proper place for honestly-held concerns about patient safety and care quality to be aired constructively. The NHS standard contract imposes a duty of candour on all NHS providers. This is an essential principle, but it is not adequately understood or applied. It should mean that all providers create a culture which is routinely open both with their patients and their commissioners. The same principle should apply to commissioners so that they are routinely open and accountable to local communities. The Health Committee recommended this approach in 2011 and repeats that now. It should be a prime role of the CQC to encourage the development of this culture within care providers, and of NHS England to develop the same culture within commissioners. The Health Committee will in future work closely with the Professional Standards Authority to develop the accountability process for professional regulators in healthcare
Download or read book Annual accountability hearing with the Care Quality Commission written by Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Health Committee and published by The Stationery Office. This book was released on 2011-09-14 with total page 120 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Following its annual review of the work of the Care Quality Commission (CQC), the Health Committee reports that the bias of the work in the CQC away from its core function of inspection and towards the essentially administrative task of registration, represents a significant distortion of priorities. The Committee reports that: the CQC was established without sufficiently clear and realistic definition of its priorities and objectives; the timescales and resource implications of the functions of the CQC were not properly analysed; the registration process itself was not properly tested and proven before it was rolled out; the CQC failed to draw the implications of these failures adequately to the attention of ministers, Parliament and the public. Consequently, the Committee welcomes the government's decision to postpone registration of GP practices, and recommends that proper planning, including piloting of the model for registration, should be undertaken before the revised date of April 2013 is confirmed. The Committee also welcomes recent announcements that the CQC intends to undertake annual visits of all NHS and social care providers. It goes on to stress the importance of the role of inspectors in assessing the culture in care providers, especially concerning the obligation which rests on all healthcare professionals to raise concerns if they recognise, or ought to have recognised, evidence of failure of professional standards. Each provider organisation should recognise and respect this professional obligation and provide proper security to those professional staff who discharge it effectively.
Download or read book HC 805 End of Life Care written by Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Health Committee and published by The Stationery Office. This book was released on 2015 with total page 57 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This report looks at the state of end of life care since the independent Review of the Liverpool Care Pathway, chaired by Baroness Neuberger. It finds great variation in quality and practice across both acute and community settings. It makes a number of recommendations for improvement, and in particular strongly recommends that social care should be free at the end of life. Other conclusions included that: all clinicians and providers who may care for people at the end of life should be aware of the Five Priorities of Care but in light of the variation in practice a senior named person in each NHS Trust be given responsibility for monitoring how end of life care is being delivered within their organisation; expertise should be more equitably available to people with a non-cancer diagnosis, older people and those with dementia; all staff who provide palliative and end of life care to people with life limiting conditions should receive training in advance care planning, including the different models and forms that are available and their legal status; most people who express a preference would like to die at home but that is made more difficult by the shortfall in community nurses and specialist outreach palliative care; sustainable, long term funding for the hospice sector also needs to be addressed as part of the Government's response to the Palliative Care Funding Review; and bereavement support for families should also be consistently included as part of end of life care
Download or read book House of Commons Sessional Returns HC 1 written by Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons and published by The Stationery Office. This book was released on 2013-09-13 with total page 350 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: On cover and title page: House, committees of the whole House, general committees and select committees. On title page: Returns to orders of the House of Commons dated 14 May 2013 (the Chairman of Ways and Means)
Download or read book Foundation Trusts and Monitor written by Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Health Committee and published by The Stationery Office. This book was released on 2008-10-17 with total page 76 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: In 2004, a new type of NHS organisation was established - the NHS foundation trust (FT) - which was to benefit from a greater degree of financial and management freedom and different arrangements to improve local accountability. There are now over 100 NHS foundation trusts. This report examines the trusts and the organisation - Monitor - that monitors their performance. FTs have some proven strengths. They have performed well financially and generated surpluses, and have been high performers in routine NHS process quality measures. But it is not clear whether their high-performance is the result of their changed status, or simply a continuation of long term trends, since the best trusts have become FTs. Key aims of FTs were the promotion of innovation and greater public involvement. There are examples of good practice in both of these areas, but again there is a lack of objective evidence. The Government should commission research to assess all aspects of FTs' performance objectively so that best practice can be shared with other FTs, and with the NHS more widely. Concerns persist about what level of Government intervention in FTs' affairs is legitimate, and the Government must clarify what the appropriate levels of intervention are. Finally, Monitor's application process and regulatory regime seems to be well regarded. However, a complex regulatory environment of other organisations also surrounds FTs, and in particular there is potential duplication between the Healthcare Commission and Monitor both of which evaluate the quality of FTs' services.
