Download or read book The Criteria for Principal Evaluation and Its Relationship to the Innovative Behavior and Size of School Districts in California written by Robert Roger Romero and published by . This book was released on 1986 with total page 440 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
Download or read book Dissertation Abstracts International written by and published by . This book was released on 1994 with total page 684 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Abstracts of dissertations available on microfilm or as xerographic reproductions.
Download or read book Comprehensive Dissertation Index written by and published by . This book was released on 1989 with total page 780 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
Download or read book Principal Peer Evaluation written by Libia S. Gil and published by Corwin Press. This book was released on 2001-06-21 with total page 108 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This book presents a framework for administrator peer evaluation within school districts that is already at work and succeeding. The evaluation design emphasizes results, promotes professional growth and development, models expectations for students and teachers, and meets Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium standards. Chapter 1 highlights the historical context for challenging the status quo of a school district and moving to a different level of professional engagement. Chapter 2 describes the genesis of a peer-evaluation concept for principals. A framework for student-based decision making is also outlined in this chapter. Chapter 3 documents the process of establishing a new format for the evaluation process. Chapter 4 contains crucial information for school districts seeking a model and describes the process of creating continuum-based principal performance and leadership standards. Chapter 5 contains a summary of progress, a view to the future, an examination of unresolved challenges, and the identification of future opportunities that will fuel efforts as the leadership role is redefined. Insights from principals' perspectives are also provided in this chapter. Appendix A contains a copy of the article, "Principals Evaluating Peers," in which the early phases of establishing the principal peer-evaluation process are described and its strengths and weaknesses identified. (RT)
Download or read book Current Evaluation Practices for the Elementary School Principal in Medium Size School Districts in the State of California written by Edward Rodevich and published by . This book was released on 1974 with total page 452 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
Download or read book The School Principal written by California. Task Force for the Improvement of Pre- and In-Service Training for Public School Administrators and published by . This book was released on 1978 with total page 90 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
Download or read book Resources in Education written by and published by . This book was released on 1998 with total page 328 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
Download or read book Index to American Doctoral Dissertations written by and published by . This book was released on 1989 with total page 1252 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
Download or read book Research in Education written by and published by . This book was released on 1973 with total page 1216 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
Download or read book How California s Local Education Agencies Evaluate Teachers and Principals REL Technical Brief REL 2012 No 023 written by Melissa Eiler White and published by . This book was released on 2012 with total page 38 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: In the context of an emerging national focus on evaluating school personnel, the 2009 federal State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF) program requires that states collect data from all local education agencies about their practices for evaluating teachers and principals. In response, the California Department of Education designed and administered the California Teacher and Principal Evaluation Survey, the state's first comprehensive data collection effort focused on teacher and principal evaluation. More than 99 percent (1,482) of the state's 1,490 local education agencies returned the survey during the summer of 2010. Because the SFSF program did not require states to produce a summary report of the findings of their data collection, the California Department of Education has not aggregated the survey responses, instead posting them only by individual local education agency (California Department of Education 2011). Both the California Department of Education and the Integrated Leadership Development Initiative, a California cross-agency collaboration focused on improving school and district leadership, requested an analysis and summary report of the survey results not only to inform their work but also to help other California decisionmakers interested in reform of teacher and principal evaluation. In addition, they wanted to know whether the educator evaluations of districts and direct-funded charter schools differ in their consideration of student achievement outcomes or student growth data and in how evaluation results are used. Four research questions guided this analysis of the California survey data: (1) How did local education agencies describe their teacher and principal evaluation systems?; (2) To what extent did local education agencies report that student achievement out-comes or student growth data were used in evaluating the performance of teachers and principals? How did the responses of districts differ from those of direct-funded charter schools?; (3) To what extent did local education agencies report using evaluation results to inform personnel decisions for teachers and principals? How did the responses of districts differ from those of direct-funded charter schools?; and (4) To what extent did local education agencies report using evaluation results to distinguish teachers and principals across multiple rating categories? The key findings indicate that: (1) Sixty-one percent of the 1,482 responding local education agencies indicated that their teacher evaluation systems are based on the California Standards for the Teaching Profession; (2) Forty-one percent reported that their local school board approves their teacher evaluation system; 64 percent reported that their local school board approves their principal evaluation system; (3) For teacher evaluation, 57 percent reported using student achievement outcomes or growth data as partial or primary evidence; for principal evaluation, 79 percent reported using these data; (4) Compared with responding districts, direct-funded charter schools reported greater use of student achievement or growth results as partial or primary evidence for educator evaluation. The differences were more pronounced in teacher evaluation: 82 percent of responding charter schools reported such use of student achievement or growth results, compared with 45 percent of districts. For principal evaluation, the figure was 85 percent of charter schools and 76 percent of districts; (5) Local education agencies reported using evaluation results in a variety of ways. They reported using results more often for high-stakes decisions about removal and retention and less often for decisions about compensation and promotion, particularly for teachers. Teacher evaluation results were reportedly used as partial or primary evidence for removal decisions in 96 percent of local education agencies, for retention decisions in 93 percent, for promotion decisions in 54 percent, and for compensation decisions in 20 percent. Principal evaluation results were used as partial or primary evidence for removal decisions in 96 percent of local education agencies, for retention decisions in 94 percent, for promotion decisions in 67 percent, and for compensation decisions in 37 percent; (6) A larger percentage of direct-funded charter schools (27 percent) than of districts (18 percent) reported using teacher evaluation results as the primary basis for decisions about professional development, promotion (17 percent versus 6 percent), and compensation (10 percent versus 1 percent). Both had a similar percentage report using evaluations in decisions on retention (41 percent in both) and removal (41 percent in both); (7) Differences between the two local education agency types in the use of principal evaluations were less uniform. A larger percentage of direct-funded charter schools (9 percent) than of districts (3 percent) reported using principal evaluation results as the primary basis for compensation decisions. However, a smaller percentage of direct-funded charter schools than of districts reported using principal evaluation results as the primary basis for decisions related to removal (36 percent versus 43 percent), retention (35 percent versus 40 percent), and professional development (19 percent versus 24 percent). Both direct-funded charter schools and districts had a similar percentage report using evaluations in promotion decisions for principals (13 percent and 14 percent); and (8) More than two-thirds of local education agencies reported having two or three performance rating levels for their teachers (37 percent had two levels, and 35 percent had three) and principals (40 percent had two levels, and 30 percent had three). Local education agencies with two rating levels reported that 98 percent of their teachers and 83 percent of their principals were rated in the highest category; agencies with three rating levels reported that 91 percent of their teachers and 98 percent of their principals were rated in the highest category. Appended are: (1) The literature on teacher and principal evaluation practices; (2) Study data and methods; (3) Additional data tables; (4) Instructions for completing the Teacher and Principal Evaluation Survey items, May 25, 2010; (5) Sample screenshots from the California Teacher and Principal Evaluation Survey; (6) Letter from the California Department of Education requesting corrections to the Teacher and Principal Evaluation Survey, July 15, 2010; (7) Letter from the California Department of Education requesting corrections to the to the Teacher and Principal Evaluation Survey, September 24, 2010; and (8) Excerpts from "Federal Register" and specific State Fiscal Stabilization Funds report requirements pertaining to the California Teacher and Principal Evaluation Survey. (Contains 1 box, 8 tables, 14 figures and 19 notes.).
Download or read book Evaluation of an Elementary Principal s Effectiveness Right and Responsibility written by California Elementary School Administrators Association and published by . This book was released on 1968 with total page 28 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
Download or read book Teacher Quality and the Role of the Principal written by California. State Board of Education and published by . This book was released on 1985 with total page 18 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
Download or read book American Doctoral Dissertations written by and published by . This book was released on 1985 with total page 696 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
Download or read book Good Principals Good Schools written by Charles H. Slaughter and published by . This book was released on 1988 with total page 200 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
Download or read book Role of the elementary School Principal written by California Elementary School Administrators Association. Oakland Chapter and published by . This book was released on 1968 with total page 36 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
Download or read book Current Index to Journals in Education written by and published by . This book was released on 1994 with total page 1576 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
Download or read book The Job of the High School Principal as Perceived by California City Superintendents written by Thomas W. Walters and published by . This book was released on 1955 with total page 266 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:
