Download or read book The Effects of Artificial Selection and Planting Density on Performance Stability Across Environments and Yield Component Traits in Maize Zea Mays L written by Bridget McFarland (Ph.D.) and published by . This book was released on 2021 with total page 0 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Plant breeders selectively breed plants to maximize productivity within the context of the target environment(s). These environments can be viewed as entire fields or regions with common features, such as weather or soil characteristics, or specific growing conditions unique to a single plant within a field. The objectives of this dissertation are: (1) assess the effects of selection and environment cues on plant performance and stability using maize hybrids derived from a common genetic background and (2) evaluate the effect of planting density on yield component traits in maize. Both of these studies utilize resources and datasets that are part of the Genomes To Fields (G2F) Initiative. Chapter One provides background on the history of maize and its importance, plant development and various abiotic influences on grain yield, and an overview of genotype-by-environment interaction (G × E) and stability. Chapter Two examines how breeding for productivity has influenced trait stability and which environmental variables are most influential in hybrid performance. Across a range of environments, we observed increased stability and improved performance in lines that had undergone multiple cycles of selection relative to unselected lines across most productivity traits (such as, stand count, flowering time, and grain yield), except stalk lodging. The environmental variables that were most influential on plant performance were those related to soil classification and day length. When comparing the environmental variables estimates across models, using genotype (G) and G × E variance in place of the raw phenotypic trait values generated environmental that were significantly correlated to the traditional stability environmental rankings. This suggests that environmental variance is not a good indicator of environment ranking, while G+ G×E better explains hybrid performance. In Chapter Three, an ever-increasing density (EID) plot design was used to evaluate the response of hybrids to increased planting densities using image-based phenotyping of grain yield components. This study used a set of three biparental populations sharing one parent in common, the others representing a highly selected, an almost complete unselected, and an intermediately selected parent. Kernel size traits were the most sensitive to increases in planting density and decreased significantly, while ear and cob width were the least sensitive and did not significantly change. The lines derived from the least selected parent produced the heaviest cobs and kernels, and largest kernel size, while the lines derived from the commercially relevant and highly selected parent produced the lightest cobs and smallest kernels. When connecting density traits data with production-level G2F data, ear height in the production-level environments was significantly correlated with ear height at two of the EID treatments. The known correlation between these two formats supports the continued use of the EID design to evaluate varying planting density effects. Overall, this work emphasizes the utility of dissecting environments at multiple levels to better understand the driving forces of plant performance and stability, and an alternative planting density scheme to understand the effects of variable planting density on yield component traits, and genetically dissect grain yield components for continued improvement.